Are scientists less prone to motivated reasoning?

Enlarge / Do these people look prone to motivated reasoning?Getty Images

A new study lays out a bit of a conundrum in its opening paragraphs. It notes that scientific progress depends on the ability to update what ideas are considered acceptable in light of new evidence. But science itself has produced no shortage of evidence that people are terrible at updating their beliefs and suffer from issues like confirmation bias and motivated reasoning. Since scientists are, in fact, people, the problems with updating beliefs should severely limit science’s ability to progress.

And there’s some indication that it does. Max Planck,

→ Continue reading at Ars Technica

Related articles


Share article

Latest articles